-
#30
by
schro
on 22 Sep, 2011 07:42
-
-
#31
by
baldjoeg
on 22 Sep, 2011 08:30
-
Great picture Razor. I like it
-
#32
by
baldjoeg
on 22 Sep, 2011 08:35
-
I agree with Mikekoz. Interesting discussion though.
-
#33
by
Slynito
on 22 Sep, 2011 11:54
-
Seems to me when I speak with Britz...they use a lot of adjectives, more than needed imho.
-
#34
by
Chavster
on 22 Sep, 2011 14:08
-
I agree with Mikekoz. Interesting discussion though.
I thought so too
-
#35
by
Tyler
on 22 Sep, 2011 15:42
-
Eats, shoots and leaves.
-
#36
by
120inna55
on 24 Sep, 2011 12:46
-
I dont know why you're feeling the need to be so antagonistic and snotty today. One day you're like chalk, the next you're like cheese. One day up, one day down. One day pleasant, one day sour. Maybe there's a reason for that, but thankfully I dont need to be surrounded by it in person.
I hope you're kidding. I don't really see anything antagonistic, per se, about the responses thus far. I just see good natured ribbing in response to a light-hearted original post. Whether your original post was intended to be a light-hearted poking fun at a culture's way of doing things, or a simple query with expectation of data, cannot be confirmed by dissecting said post. That said, one might expect, in the presence of a public forum such as this, at least some degree of retort.
Now, on a personal note...
Despite my being native Texan (many of us cling closer to our Texas heritage more so than that of our nation), the use of the commas as indicated in headlines has always seemed awkward to me, and thus counters the presumed purpose which is to make it more concise.
-
#37
by
Chavster
on 24 Sep, 2011 12:48
-
Nope, unfortunately I wasnt kidding, but I also wasnt referring to the replies just on this thread. Tom and I rarely go a day without fighting

but hopefully its in a friendly way rather than an 'I dislike you' kind of way. It certainly isnt that from my side of things.
-
#38
by
Arnie
on 24 Sep, 2011 13:49
-
You know what really chaps my hide?
When people don't use a comma after the second person before the "and" in a group of three or more.
Tyler, Schro and BaldRob walk into a bar... 
Tyler, Schro, and BaldRob walk into a bar...
-
#39
by
Chavster
on 24 Sep, 2011 13:52
-
Im more than happy to be proved wrong, but I have a feeling the version that pisses you off is the correct one (although I tend to use the one that doesnt piss you off)
-
#40
by
Razor X
on 24 Sep, 2011 14:10
-
Im more than happy to be proved wrong, but I have a feeling the version that pisses you off is the correct one (although I tend to use the one that doesnt piss you off)
I believe that the second comma is known as the Oxford comma. I was always taught that it was the correct usage, just as Arnie said. I also thought it was standard usage in British English. However, more often than not it is omitted in common usage. Both ways seem to be considered acceptable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
-
#41
by
Laser Man
on 24 Sep, 2011 14:19
-
Razor is right - it's known as the Oxford comma. It was taught as the correct punctuation when I went to school, but that was long enough ago that the rules have changed / slipped. The comma before the "and" was meant to delineate a series of individual items from a grouping of what came before and after the "and".
-
#42
by
BReady
on 24 Sep, 2011 14:24
-
I personally did not use a comma just before the conjunction. After reading this thread and about the serial comma, I can see why that can be a problem.
As for the OP's question about the lack of "and" in the headline. I always thought weird sounding headlines were for the sake of making it short as possible.
Dog Bites Mailman (instead of A Dog Bites the Mailman) is an example
I guess Bush, Obama eat at the Olive Garden would be the same?
...and here is the first thing I thought of when it was mentioned that Brit's use the word "right" a lot:
Shawn says, "Right!" just before he explains his plan.
-
#43
by
tomgallagher
on 24 Sep, 2011 14:36
-
Whatever happened to the possessive apostrophe in the English language.
a. That is Franks' automobile.
Nowadays it always seems to be written,
b. That is Frank's automobile.
-
#44
by
Razor X
on 24 Sep, 2011 14:37
-
Whatever happened to the posessive apostrophe in the English language.
a. That is Franks' automobile.
Nowadays it always seems to be written,
b. That is Frank's automobile.
The apostrophe after the S (example A) is plural possesive and Example B is singular possessive.