I have formulated a new theory... Gillette, and others keep coming out with these new bigger, faster, more power, more blades razors but it seems to me that I used to get a fine shave back in the old days with a regular old razor, (one blade or maybe two) but now even my Mach III seems to not do such a good job anymore. Do Gillette et al come out with these new, expensive razors (e.g. 4 + 1 Fusion) and then start making crappy blades for the other models, such as the Mach III? Does that explain why they won't make the new razors interchangeable with the old system?Have a chew on that for a while and then let me know what you think. Is it just my paranoid, dillusional imagination working overtime, or what? Man, that's deep!!! But seriously, I'm sort of with you on this one. I use to use a Mach 3 a while back and it did a fairly decent job. Then I switched over to the Fusion but went back to the Mach 3 very quickly because of the cost of the Fusion blades. I noticed that the Mach 3 didn't seem the same. It's almost like you said about the blades...They just didn't seem to cut as good as they use to. Then again it could be because the Fusion worked so good that going back to the Mach 3 couldn't compare. Probably all in my head but who knows? It don't matter now anyway because I'm a hardcore HeadBlader and will never go back to anything. Speaking of that...just for the hell of it a few days ago I gave my old Mach 3 a test. I was just curious to see what the difference would be between it and the HB. I used the Mach 3 with some old shave gel I had. It felt like the Mach 3 was dragging across my skin. Needless to say, I'll never be curious agian. HeadBlade all the way!!!! This could be a serious issue. At the rate they are coming out with bigger razors, by the time I am 70, I won't be able to lift my razor anymore.
It ain't far-fetched, Shiny....and wouldn't surprise me.
Quote from: Robmeister on March 15, 2007, 10:04:56 AMIt ain't far-fetched, Shiny....and wouldn't surprise me.Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but personally, I ain't buyin' it. Why would a company intentionally produce a product that declines in performance? I have found that Gillette Sensor blades perform just as well and last just as long as they did when I first started using them in the mid 90's. Granted, I never jumped on 3, 4, or 5 blade bandwagon as others did, so I can't comment on any decline in efficacy of such blades. Oh, on a side note, the generic Atra Blades I got at Albertson's (Equaline) are awesome.
Then I guess I was lucky and picked the ONLY type of blade that is still being produced at the same level of quality standards today as it was when it was introduced. Boy I'm not only an Ordinary American, I'm a Lucky Ordinary American.I respectfully disagree on this one.Let's discuss this over a beer.
Quote from: schro on March 15, 2007, 10:21:03 AMQuote from: Robmeister on March 15, 2007, 10:04:56 AMIt ain't far-fetched, Shiny....and wouldn't surprise me.Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but personally, I ain't buyin' it. Why would a company intentionally produce a product that declines in performance? I have found that Gillette Sensor blades perform just as well and last just as long as they did when I first started using them in the mid 90's. Granted, I never jumped on 3, 4, or 5 blade bandwagon as others did, so I can't comment on any decline in efficacy of such blades. Oh, on a side note, the generic Atra Blades I got at Albertson's (Equaline) are awesome. I dunno...corporate/manufacturers "obselescence" strategies are out there.
has anyone heard of the computer industry? most computers are obsolete as soon as you buy one.