-
#60
by
FR8TRAIN
on 18 Jun, 2008 11:18
-
I need some suggestions. I wear glasses with no line bifocals and transition lenses (not too bad, but not dark enough). I cannot wear contacts.
Are there any good prescription sunglasses that can accommodate my no line bifocals? Do any of you have success or failures to share?
Max
Before I got contacts I wore a pair of Silhouette prescription sunglasses (
http://www.silhouette.com/) and they were no-line bifocals. I had great success with them. They are extremely lightweight and very comfortable.
-
#61
by
JDog
on 18 Jun, 2008 20:55
-
fr8train I am of the same belief.
Paying a premium price for a premium product that last longer and provide better protection is well worth it.
-
#62
by
JDog
on 18 Jun, 2008 21:01
-
Hey Red,
Oakley Flak Jackets (polorized) are what I wear on a daily (in my pic) though my girlfriend found me a great pair of Pradas that I might pick up next week.
http://www.abs-sunglasses.com/Shades/ProductImages/23/PR_SPR_60F_1BO-1A1_01.jpg
I've posted a new avatar pic with my Prada shades on. Very much like the shape of the ones in your link, but with wider temple pieces. I'd forgotten how cool they are 
Prada, Oakley? Why do you need such expensive sunglasses? You can't buy coolness. Drug store store shades are just as good. Have the same UV ray protection. I rarely wear sunglasses. I'm no movie star and definitlely have nothing to hide from.
Sly Buckeye Tyro-Agent Provacateur?
I think not. He just likes to look at both sides of the coin, No problem in that.
Tyro you are alright in my book. Nice! High Five!
-
#63
by
nomad
on 20 Jun, 2008 13:33
-
I need some suggestions. I wear glasses with no line bifocals and transition lenses (not too bad, but not dark enough). I cannot wear contacts.
Are there any good prescription sunglasses that can accommodate my no line bifocals? Do any of you have success or failures to share?
Max
Before I got contacts I wore a pair of Silhouette prescription sunglasses (http://www.silhouette.com/) and they were no-line bifocals. I had great success with them. They are extremely lightweight and very comfortable.
Oakley has alot of their styles that can be fitted with perscription lenses
-
#64
by
Razor X
on 25 Jun, 2008 13:23
-
-
#65
by
FR8TRAIN
on 25 Jun, 2008 13:46
-
-
#66
by
Razor X
on 25 Jun, 2008 15:21
-
-
#67
by
RICKYBOBBY74
on 25 Jun, 2008 19:57
-

rite now i rock this brand sorry couldnt find a pic of actually shades i wear.i still have my oakleys too
-
#68
by
no1birdman
on 26 Jun, 2008 01:43
-
Hi, opened that link to sunglasses, got a virus warning, be careful
-
#69
by
RICKYBOBBY74
on 20 Jul, 2008 20:17
-
ok i don't "loose" many things, let alone a good expensive pair of sunglasses!!!!! By the way it's lose. u lose things. not loose things. if u loose things that means they don't fit so tight anymore. this loose vs. lose thing has become a bad epidemic......i see more people loosing things where they probably are really losing things. maybe thats y so many things remain un-foundededed
-
#70
by
FR8TRAIN
on 20 Jul, 2008 21:03
-
-
#71
by
RICKYBOBBY74
on 20 Jul, 2008 21:07
-
no to hell w/ the sunglasses thread.... this is now the loose vs lose thread.... get a dictionary people ......u dont ever loose things...unless it's the frickin rope from around your necks....u lose things when they become missing.......
-
#72
by
BlackJamesRackham
on 20 Jul, 2008 21:08
-
hahah did Timmay take over rickybobby's name?
-
#73
by
FR8TRAIN
on 20 Jul, 2008 21:09
-
hahah did Timmay take over rickybobby's name?
Man I thought the same thing...
-
#74
by
RICKYBOBBY74
on 20 Jul, 2008 21:14
-
no its still a rickybobby thing just now i'm more crazy