Schro....your right....if the politicans had kept their grubby hands off the fund we wouldn't have the problem we are having now..... 
For the record, that is a paraphrase! I don't want to be accused of of stirring the political pot.

There are a lot of issues with social security. My point is only one of them.
As an example of an enterprise fund (which is basically like a private business owned by the government), look to San Francisco. In SF, one of the nicest public golf courses in the nation (Harding Park) was basically run into the ground because the city's government kept stealing money from the account of the course to pay for their littany of civil service programs. Well, when they kept doing that, they left no money for course maintenance, and people stopped playing the course because it was in such awful condition. Round count is down, which means less revenue.
Well, the US PGA made an agreement with the City of San Francisco that they'd host several world events at Harding Park (including next year's President's Cup), in exchange for course renovations. As part of the agreement (which took two years longer than it should have because of San Franciso's city government's "
way of doing things"), the bulk of the money stays in the course, and the First Tee youth golf program was started.
Now, Harding Park is thriving, round count is up, and all is good.