I heard Bill Parcells interviewed on ESPN about the ref situation. He likened it to rain in that if it's raining during the game it doesn't just rain on one team, it rains on both of them. The same can be said of the ref situation. These guys make a lot of bad calls but they make bad calls (or non-calls) against everybody. I think that the teams need to plan for this during their preparation for games, that the refs will make bad calls. In the case of the Green Bay/Seattle game I don't think that anyone would have guessed that with 6 seconds to go in the game that Green Bay would have only scored 12 points. This is a team that averaged, what?, 35 last year and the best they could do was 12? And Rodgers gets sacked 8 times in the first half? When was the last time we saw that? (Never?). The more I think about it, even though (as primarily a Bears fan) I like the Packers they should have had more than 12 on the board. This is like what they say in UFC matches: If you don't finish your opponent you're leaving the decision in the hands of the judges. This is what Green Bay was guilty of, they didn't finish the Seahawks. They left it in the hands of people they knew were not competent to make the decision and they paid for it.