He looks better with hair, yes. But doesn't everyone when they have good coverage?
Wikipedia says he shaved it for the King & I and never went back. I think I do remember a movie, a western if I'm not totally senile, that he did hair. Whether it was his or not, I don't know. I just think it really "stopped" his aging for appearance purposes. Without a "hair reference" for color, hairline, etc., it gets to be a little tough to estimate a guy's actual age. And that's a good thing.
Quote from: saintc on April 18, 2010, 01:36:09 PMWikipedia says he shaved it for the King & I and never went back. I think I do remember a movie, a western if I'm not totally senile, that he did hair. Whether it was his or not, I don't know. I just think it really "stopped" his aging for appearance purposes. Without a "hair reference" for color, hairline, etc., it gets to be a little tough to estimate a guy's actual age. And that's a good thing. Why did he have to shave for The King and I? Was the actual King of Siam bald? Or did they think it made Yul more exotic looking or somehow disguise the obvious fact that he wasn't Asian? I've always wondered.It's pretty amazing that he continued to get roles with a shaved head back in the 50s and 60s. Hollywood didn't usually embrace non-mainstream looks bakc then.
I think I do remember a movie, a western if I'm not totally senile, that he did hair.
Quote from: JOE-91 on April 18, 2010, 11:05:25 AMHe looks better with hair, yes. But doesn't everyone when they have good coverage?No, the point was, he doesn't look better with hair.