Author Topic: Google Chrome  (Read 10161 times)

Offline wpruitt

  • Sly Moderator
  • Sly Nobility
  • *****
  • Posts: 5102
  • Sly!!
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #15 on: September 04, 2008, 08:43:52 PM »
The only glitches I've seen so far (aside from only being available for Windows) is its handling of PNG translucencies. And its form autocompletion is applied rather haphazardly.

Luckily, it's based upon the WebKit renderer (same as used by Apple's Safari and the Omni Group's OmniWeb, as well as Adobe AIR) so at least it's not a completely new renderer for us web devo types to have to worry about. But it is another browser that we'll need to test on.
As they say in the Redneck South, "Do what ?"
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." - Theodore Roosevelt

Offline slyinglide

  • Give till it hurts!
  • Ultimate Sly Guy
  • *****
  • Posts: 604
  • Work hard, Play harder, Love Often
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #16 on: September 04, 2008, 09:02:58 PM »
The only glitches I've seen so far (aside from only being available for Windows) is its handling of PNG translucencies. And its form autocompletion is applied rather haphazardly.

Luckily, it's based upon the WebKit renderer (same as used by Apple's Safari and the Omni Group's OmniWeb, as well as Adobe AIR) so at least it's not a completely new renderer for us web devo types to have to worry about. But it is another browser that we'll need to test on.
He's right....You can not miss handle the PNG's they could get Muuuuushy.

Psssst.....Could someone please tell me what the heck a PNG is?.......and explain all that other stuff he said....
I was told to think outside the box, how did I get in the box in the first place?

Offline TheSlyBear

  • Opinionated Walrus
  • Team Sly
  • Sly Bureau
  • ******
  • Posts: 2961
  • Country: us
  • 忍者クマ
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #17 on: September 04, 2008, 09:21:34 PM »
LOL... sorry for geeking out.

PNG is a graphics format like JPEG. It's an advanced format that, unlike JPEG, can handle translucency -- the fancier sites that you see around that use drop-shadows and the like are taking advantage of this format.

The rest was just bitching about having one more browser to test web applications on...

Offline nomad

  • Sly Beach Bum!!
  • Sly Moderator
  • Sly Bureau
  • *****
  • Posts: 1963
    • Conch Republic Bikinis
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2008, 10:06:45 PM »
LOL... sorry for geeking out.

PNG is a graphics format like JPEG. It's an advanced format that, unlike JPEG, can handle translucency -- the fancier sites that you see around that use drop-shadows and the like are taking advantage of this format.

The rest was just bitching about having one more browser to test web applications on...

Ya what he said  :*))

I'm using it now and not to bad so far for us novices O0
 

Offline J Digory

  • My head's like my bass playin': Smooth
  • Super Sly
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
  • Country: 00
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #19 on: September 04, 2008, 10:14:34 PM »
I have a mac. So no...

Offline FR8TRAIN

  • Sly Bureau
  • *****
  • Posts: 1286
  • Country: us
  • Go ahead, rub it!
    • Facebook
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2008, 10:28:15 PM »
The only glitches I've seen so far (aside from only being available for Windows) is its handling of PNG translucencies. And its form autocompletion is applied rather haphazardly.

Luckily, it's based upon the WebKit renderer (same as used by Apple's Safari and the Omni Group's OmniWeb, as well as Adobe AIR) so at least it's not a completely new renderer for us web devo types to have to worry about. But it is another browser that we'll need to test on.

So BB will you report a bug to Google dev for the PNG issue? It is Open Source and this is a Beta version. They might get it worked out if you ask. I expect a Mac version to be released within the year.
Tis better to have a bald head than no head at all.

Offline TheSlyBear

  • Opinionated Walrus
  • Team Sly
  • Sly Bureau
  • ******
  • Posts: 2961
  • Country: us
  • 忍者クマ
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #21 on: September 04, 2008, 10:46:29 PM »
I have a mac. So no...
That is it's biggest drawback.

So BB will you report a bug to Google dev for the PNG issue?
Already have. They already know all about me from other bug reporting.  :x!


Offline DJ_Bald

  • Super Sly
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
  • Letting it shine !
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #22 on: September 04, 2008, 11:01:19 PM »
Wow ! This browser works pretty darn good and is much faster than IE7 and Mozilla.
I am a techie by trade and yes this will be one more browser to test on but its VERY fast and efficient.
I love when you start to type in the URL it gives you a choice of finding the website that contains the text you want or gives you the option of doing a google search with that text. VERY cool.   
Type in "Philadelphia Eagles" and you will see what I mean. I am rarely impressed by something like this..very cool.

Shave your head.....free your mind.

Offline FR8TRAIN

  • Sly Bureau
  • *****
  • Posts: 1286
  • Country: us
  • Go ahead, rub it!
    • Facebook
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #23 on: September 04, 2008, 11:07:48 PM »
I have a mac. So no...
That is it's biggest drawback.

So BB will you report a bug to Google dev for the PNG issue?
Already have. They already know all about me from other bug reporting.  :x!



Very good.  O0
Tis better to have a bald head than no head at all.

Offline Tyler

  • The Count of Sly
  • Administrator
  • Sly Nobility
  • *****
  • Posts: 13409
  • Country: us
    • SILIST - Smitty's Information List
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2008, 12:55:17 AM »
I've been playing with it for the last couple of hours and while it is fast, so is Firefox without any plugins.  This brings me to some "flaws" that I have found.

1) Because it is so new, there isn't any of the plugins that are required for many video sites on the web, such as ABC.com and Fox.com.  These will only come if there's enough people using the browser.
2) Chrome doesn't always render proper CSS and XHTML appropriately. 
3) Importing bookmarks and such from Firefox is broken.
4) Oh, and typing Google.com in the address bar closes the browser...wtf?
5) I don't like that when I open a new browser that it shows all the pages I viewed last session.
People are not limited by the circumstance that they are born in. They are limited by the size of their dreams. Show them that their dreams can have no limits and in turn their accomplishments can be limitless.

Offline The Zook

  • One Blade Renegade
  • Super Sly
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
  • Collector O'Razors
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2008, 01:12:32 AM »
Can you describe the PNG issue? I have PNG graphics on all of my sites and haven't seen anything unusual, and yes they have transparency in them.

One is layer over layer of transparency:
http://geocaching.l13.us

A Mac version is in the works, can't wait since that is what I use at home.



The only glitches I've seen so far (aside from only being available for Windows) is its handling of PNG translucencies. And its form autocompletion is applied rather haphazardly.

Luckily, it's based upon the WebKit renderer (same as used by Apple's Safari and the Omni Group's OmniWeb, as well as Adobe AIR) so at least it's not a completely new renderer for us web devo types to have to worry about. But it is another browser that we'll need to test on.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2008, 01:30:54 AM by Lucky13MN »

Offline FR8TRAIN

  • Sly Bureau
  • *****
  • Posts: 1286
  • Country: us
  • Go ahead, rub it!
    • Facebook
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2008, 08:50:09 AM »
I've been playing with it for the last couple of hours and while it is fast, so is Firefox without any plugins.  This brings me to some "flaws" that I have found.

1) Because it is so new, there isn't any of the plugins that are required for many video sites on the web, such as ABC.com and Fox.com.  These will only come if there's enough people using the browser.
2) Chrome doesn't always render proper CSS and XHTML appropriately. 
3) Importing bookmarks and such from Firefox is broken.
4) Oh, and typing Google.com in the address bar closes the browser...wtf?
5) I don't like that when I open a new browser that it shows all the pages I viewed last session.

I have had no problem what so ever with the issues in bold. All video at ABC.com played flawlessly. When I typed Google.com in the address bar it navigated to the google home page.
Tis better to have a bald head than no head at all.

Offline tomgallagher

  • Ad Free VIP
  • Sly Nobility
  • *****
  • Posts: 5497
  • Country: us
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #27 on: September 05, 2008, 09:24:40 AM »
Tried it and don't like it.

Offline Hook'Em

  • Super Sly
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #28 on: September 05, 2008, 09:29:27 AM »
Any of you tekkies answer this for me. I have to adjust the font settings to a larger font but every time i open Chrome it goes back to the original size. Is there any way to keep the font settings that i want?
<a href="http://www.imagechef.com/" target="_blank"> [img width= height= alt=ImageChef.com - Custom comment codes for MySpace, Hi5, Friendster and more]http://cdn-img1.imagechef.com/w/080722/samp3621da6c52487d03.jpg[/img]

Offline The Zook

  • One Blade Renegade
  • Super Sly
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
  • Collector O'Razors
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #29 on: September 05, 2008, 09:44:28 AM »
Guessing:

Options
Minor Tweaks
Fonts and Languages